2 week hx of lesion. VDRL and TPHA negative. Bisexual male. | Figure 1
BurhanAhmedMD
Case Overview
2 week hx of lesion. VDRL and TPHA negative. Bisexual male. 42 year old. no condom use.
More about this case
ResolvedTrending
Why you should join Figure 1
- Share your knowledge with our global community of healthcare professionals
- Get help from experts in your field
- Learn from our library of real-world cases and quizzes
Similar cases
A 23‐year‐old man presented with a 2‐month history of recurrent fever and progressing skin ulcers with eschars on his face, trunk and extremities (a, b). Treponemal serology test was positive and immunohistochemistry of his skin biopsy showed numerous spirochetes (c, arrows). Additional results confirmed that he was infected with HIV, with a decreased CD4+ T‐cell count. A diagnosis of malignant syphilis associated with HIV infection was finally made. Malignant syphilis is an uncommon manifestation of secondary syphilis, characterized by generalized ulcerative skin lesions with prodromal symptoms. Generally, it occurs in immunosuppressed individuals, especially in HIV‐infected patients. Malignant syphilis may be the initial presentation of underlying HIV infection. The patient was treated with doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 14 days as he was allergic to penicillin. The therapy resulted in rapid regression of the skin lesions (d), and antiretroviral therapy was initiated.
No c/o itching, + pain, + RPR & + syphilis titer. Rash starts at #Umbilicus & wraps to buttocks. Syphilis rash?
25 yo M came in through urgent care with small patch on left side of tongue. Worried about STI exposure. Stated Within 5 hours of last sexual experience. Slightly erythemous with a 1cm proximation. Any ideas of what this may be? STI - wise?
Patient with history of severe mental illness (unpredictable mood, dementia-like symptoms) presents to PCP with no abnormal symptoms for routine physical and testing with STI screening. All tests came back as normal for blood work and negative for STI. \ 1 week later, the lab happened to be attempting validation for EIA Syphillus via analyzer. Patient's blood was pulled as a "known negative." Via this method, the patient presented as a strong positive on 10/10 repetitions. \ To rule out the possibility of a false positive via misperforming EIA, RPR was retested by 3 separate personnel, resulting in a confirmed negative screen and ruling out lab procrdural error. A confirmatory TPPA was performed afterward to confirm true negative. This, however, resulted in a positive reaction, confirming the reaction from the validation studies. \ This false negative RPR was later confirmed to be due to tertiary syphillus. It seems that all the stars aligned for the patient in order to finally reach a diagnosis. Sadly, any damage done up to this point is beyond reversible.
Trending now
A 52-year-old man presented with a 20-minute history of chest pain radiating to the left shoulder and neck, associated with dyspnea and diaphoresis. \ He had a history of hypertension, long-term smoking, and a sedentary lifestyle. \ On physical examination, bibasilar crackles were noted on lung auscultation. An electrocardiogram (ECG) was performed in the primary care setting, and the patient was promptly referred to the emergency department.
A 28-year-old woman presented with a 3-day history of intense pruritus over the lower back. She reported no recent travel or exposure to new environments. She cares for a small kennel with approximately eight dogs rescued from the streets. \ Physical examination revealed multiple small vesicles, some clustered and others scattered, predominantly involving the lumbar region and the left gluteal area.
A 4-month-old male infant presented with skin lesions localized to the chin for the past 3 days. Physical examination revealed multiple small pustules with surrounding inflammatory signs on the chin, along with a few scattered papules on the chest.
patient in late teens presenting after a collapse, no chest pain, no previous cardiac history, no history of sudden death in family, are there any features in this ekg that would warrant further work-up or is this just a pediatric ekg?